<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 55 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Department due to invalid authorizations lacking reasons for concluding the orders were not legal or proper, emphasizing the necessity for clear opinions and detailed inspections. It affirmed its power to adjudicate validity and urged rectification of procedural discrepancies, emphasizing uniformity in processes. The Tribunal advised the Member (Legal) to ensure compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 55 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Department due to invalid authorizations lacking reasons for concluding the orders were not legal or proper, emphasizing the necessity for clear opinions and detailed inspections. It affirmed its power to adjudicate validity and urged rectification of procedural discrepancies, emphasizing uniformity in processes. The Tribunal advised the Member (Legal) to ensure compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>