<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 55 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436029</link>
    <description>A Section 9 insolvency petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found maintainable because the alleged dispute was not shown to be genuine or pre-existing. The operational debt was not disputed, the goods had been accepted and used, and quality objections raised only after the inspection report were treated as an afterthought. Correspondence and surrounding material did not establish a bona fide dispute existing before the demand notice, so the debtor&#039;s defence could not defeat admission of insolvency proceedings. The decision confirms that a belated or sham objection will not bar admission where default is otherwise established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2023 22:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 55 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436029</link>
      <description>A Section 9 insolvency petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found maintainable because the alleged dispute was not shown to be genuine or pre-existing. The operational debt was not disputed, the goods had been accepted and used, and quality objections raised only after the inspection report were treated as an afterthought. Correspondence and surrounding material did not establish a bona fide dispute existing before the demand notice, so the debtor&#039;s defence could not defeat admission of insolvency proceedings. The decision confirms that a belated or sham objection will not bar admission where default is otherwise established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>