<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1517 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307277</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the reassessment was invalid due to the failure to issue a notice under Section 143(2) to the Assessee when reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, leading to the disposal of the appeals. The Court did not address the jurisdictional requirement or justification for reopening the assessments, as the invalidity of the reassessment sufficed for the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2023 21:45:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1517 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307277</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the reassessment was invalid due to the failure to issue a notice under Section 143(2) to the Assessee when reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, leading to the disposal of the appeals. The Court did not address the jurisdictional requirement or justification for reopening the assessments, as the invalidity of the reassessment sufficed for the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>