<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 22 - ITAT PUNE  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that the property sold was a capital asset and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. However, it found fault with the allowance of the cost of construction without proper evidence and remitted this aspect for reevaluation. The appeal was partly allowed, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2023 08:21:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 22 - ITAT PUNE  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that the property sold was a capital asset and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. However, it found fault with the allowance of the cost of construction without proper evidence and remitted this aspect for reevaluation. The appeal was partly allowed, and the matter was remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>