https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435986 Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was treated as operating with revived twin bail conditions after the 2018 amendment, because the amended provision was regarded as effective unless struck down and not diluted merely because the entire section was not reenacted. On the facts, anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners because the alleged disproportionate assets were below one crore rupees and medical material showed illness and infirmity, subject to compliance with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions. The applications were allowed and release on arrest or surrender was directed on specified terms. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Apr 2023 08:21:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435986 Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was treated as operating with revived twin bail conditions after the 2018 amendment, because the amended provision was regarded as effective unless struck down and not diluted merely because the entire section was not reenacted. On the facts, anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners because the alleged disproportionate assets were below one crore rupees and medical material showed illness and infirmity, subject to compliance with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions. The applications were allowed and release on arrest or surrender was directed on specified terms. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435986