<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 133 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32303</link>
    <description>Parallel proceedings could not continue where the appellant had already invoked the Service Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2008 for the same matter. The Tribunal held that once recourse to the scheme was taken in respect of the dispute covered by the appeal, the appellant could not pursue the appeal simultaneously before the Tribunal. On that basis, the appeal was held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 133 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32303</link>
      <description>Parallel proceedings could not continue where the appellant had already invoked the Service Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2008 for the same matter. The Tribunal held that once recourse to the scheme was taken in respect of the dispute covered by the appeal, the appellant could not pursue the appeal simultaneously before the Tribunal. On that basis, the appeal was held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>