https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32296 The Tribunal determined the classification of 'Scrabble Junior' and 'Scrabble Dice,' placing them under specific CET sub-headings. It rejected the application of precedent in a similar case, emphasizing its inability to review its own orders. The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 11AC but directed a re-computation from the provision's introduction. It dismissed the plea for re-computation of duty liability based on cum-duty price, highlighting the importance of raising all relevant submissions during proceedings. The application was disposed of with an emphasis on correct classification, limitations on review, penalty application, and procedural requirements. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32296 The Tribunal determined the classification of 'Scrabble Junior' and 'Scrabble Dice,' placing them under specific CET sub-headings. It rejected the application of precedent in a similar case, emphasizing its inability to review its own orders. The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 11AC but directed a re-computation from the provision's introduction. It dismissed the plea for re-computation of duty liability based on cum-duty price, highlighting the importance of raising all relevant submissions during proceedings. The application was disposed of with an emphasis on correct classification, limitations on review, penalty application, and procedural requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32296