https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32286 The Tribunal found discrepancies in the calculation of short-payment and taxable value in the original order regarding service tax liability on composite contracts for erecting sub-stations. The appellant argued that the demand for differential service tax should not be payable if the two services cannot be separated. Given the pending issue of vivisecting composite contracts for service tax purposes before a Larger Bench, the Tribunal waived the dues as per the impugned order and stayed the recovery until the appeals' disposal. en-us Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32286 The Tribunal found discrepancies in the calculation of short-payment and taxable value in the original order regarding service tax liability on composite contracts for erecting sub-stations. The appellant argued that the demand for differential service tax should not be payable if the two services cannot be separated. Given the pending issue of vivisecting composite contracts for service tax purposes before a Larger Bench, the Tribunal waived the dues as per the impugned order and stayed the recovery until the appeals' disposal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32286