<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Appeal After 2569-Day Delay; Lawyer&#039;s Illness and Death Not Sufficient Justification for Late Filing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68990</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay of 2569 days in filing the appeal - the Lawyer handling the case had suffered from serious illness and ultimately died - ufficient cause for delay - The long and short of the narration is that as far as the Petitioner/Assessee is concerned, the explanation offered for an extraordinary delay of 2569 days was not convincing at all. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:53:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Appeal After 2569-Day Delay; Lawyer&#039;s Illness and Death Not Sufficient Justification for Late Filing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68990</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay of 2569 days in filing the appeal - the Lawyer handling the case had suffered from serious illness and ultimately died - ufficient cause for delay - The long and short of the narration is that as far as the Petitioner/Assessee is concerned, the explanation offered for an extraordinary delay of 2569 days was not convincing at all. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:53:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>