<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 34 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32271</link>
    <description>Prima facie compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 32/2004-ST was treated as sufficient to justify waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty at the interim stage. The stay application turned on whether the benefit of the notification was available subject to fulfilment of its conditions, and the record disclosed a prima facie case in the applicant&#039;s favour. On that basis, pre-deposit was dispensed with and interim relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 34 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32271</link>
      <description>Prima facie compliance with the conditions of Notification No. 32/2004-ST was treated as sufficient to justify waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalty at the interim stage. The stay application turned on whether the benefit of the notification was available subject to fulfilment of its conditions, and the record disclosed a prima facie case in the applicant&#039;s favour. On that basis, pre-deposit was dispensed with and interim relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>