<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1311 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the assessment order invalid due to procedural lapses and lack of proper inquiries. The addition of Rs. 9,75,90,067 under Section 68 was deemed unjustified as the assessee disowned the bank accounts, citing fraudulent use of documents. The appeal was allowed on legal and merit grounds, setting aside the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1311 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding the assessment order invalid due to procedural lapses and lack of proper inquiries. The addition of Rs. 9,75,90,067 under Section 68 was deemed unjustified as the assessee disowned the bank accounts, citing fraudulent use of documents. The appeal was allowed on legal and merit grounds, setting aside the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>