<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1308 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 5,05,756/- for non-furnishing of vouchers. However, the disallowance of Rs. 38,00,098/- under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C was upheld. The Tribunal rejected the argument to restrict the disallowance to 30% post-amendment to section 40(a)(ia), citing prospective application from AY 2015-16.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1308 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 5,05,756/- for non-furnishing of vouchers. However, the disallowance of Rs. 38,00,098/- under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under section 194C was upheld. The Tribunal rejected the argument to restrict the disallowance to 30% post-amendment to section 40(a)(ia), citing prospective application from AY 2015-16.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>