https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435908 The High Court allowed the exemptions and condoned the 10-day delay in re-filing the appeal. The appellant's appeal against the rejection of its Anti-Dumping Condonation of Delay Application by the CESTAT was upheld. The Court found that the CESTAT erred in rejecting the appeal based on limitation, as the appellant was not raising new grounds but seeking to maintain the earlier appeal. The High Court set aside the CESTAT's order, restored the appeal for consideration on merits, and directed the appellant to deposit a specified sum for the appeal to be reinstated before the CESTAT. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:17:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435908 The High Court allowed the exemptions and condoned the 10-day delay in re-filing the appeal. The appellant's appeal against the rejection of its Anti-Dumping Condonation of Delay Application by the CESTAT was upheld. The Court found that the CESTAT erred in rejecting the appeal based on limitation, as the appellant was not raising new grounds but seeking to maintain the earlier appeal. The High Court set aside the CESTAT's order, restored the appeal for consideration on merits, and directed the appellant to deposit a specified sum for the appeal to be reinstated before the CESTAT. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435908