https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32267 Abatement under Notification No. 1/2006 depended on proof that the notification conditions were satisfied. The Tribunal found that the existing record required fresh verification of the documents and other evidence relied on to establish compliance, and it noted that a similar matter had already been remanded for examination of the same issues. The adjudicating authority was also directed to examine the availability of Cenvat credit as raised by the assessee. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo verification of compliance with the notification conditions. en-us Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32267 Abatement under Notification No. 1/2006 depended on proof that the notification conditions were satisfied. The Tribunal found that the existing record required fresh verification of the documents and other evidence relied on to establish compliance, and it noted that a similar matter had already been remanded for examination of the same issues. The adjudicating authority was also directed to examine the availability of Cenvat credit as raised by the assessee. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo verification of compliance with the notification conditions. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32267