<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1277 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435891</link>
    <description>A petition seeking directions to compel, monitor and expedite investigation into alleged fraud and money-laundering was declined because the concerned investigative agencies had already commenced and continued their enquiries. The Court noted that status reports from the Economic Offences Wing, the Enforcement Directorate and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office showed ongoing investigation, and reiterated that supervision of investigation is exceptional and the conduct of investigation remains primarily with the investigating agency. It also observed that parallel remedies were available before the NCLT and RERA authorities, leaving no basis for the additional mandamus sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1277 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435891</link>
      <description>A petition seeking directions to compel, monitor and expedite investigation into alleged fraud and money-laundering was declined because the concerned investigative agencies had already commenced and continued their enquiries. The Court noted that status reports from the Economic Offences Wing, the Enforcement Directorate and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office showed ongoing investigation, and reiterated that supervision of investigation is exceptional and the conduct of investigation remains primarily with the investigating agency. It also observed that parallel remedies were available before the NCLT and RERA authorities, leaving no basis for the additional mandamus sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>