<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1273 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Quality Builders &amp;amp; Contractor, granting the refund of service tax deposited under mistaken belief. It held that the construction of individual residential houses was exempt under the Exemption Notification dated June 20, 2012, and the refund was not barred by the principles of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and ruled in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1273 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Quality Builders &amp;amp; Contractor, granting the refund of service tax deposited under mistaken belief. It held that the construction of individual residential houses was exempt under the Exemption Notification dated June 20, 2012, and the refund was not barred by the principles of unjust enrichment. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and ruled in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>