<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1377 - KERALA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307247</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was considered unjustified where the order did not record any compelling ground of grave urgency, as required for immediate action under Regulation 16. The Court found the suspension order deficient on that basis and required a fresh decision. The matter was remitted for reconsideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, reflecting the need for procedural fairness before any continued action on the licence suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1377 - KERALA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307247</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was considered unjustified where the order did not record any compelling ground of grave urgency, as required for immediate action under Regulation 16. The Court found the suspension order deficient on that basis and required a fresh decision. The matter was remitted for reconsideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, reflecting the need for procedural fairness before any continued action on the licence suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>