<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1336 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307245</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order was held not maintainable because an alternate and efficacious statutory appeal remedy was available. Although the petitioner relied on Supreme Court authority on the continuing applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to clubs, the Court declined writ adjudication and directed that any grievance be pursued before the Appellate Tribunal, where errors in the impugned order could be corrected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 01:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=709052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1336 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307245</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order was held not maintainable because an alternate and efficacious statutory appeal remedy was available. Although the petitioner relied on Supreme Court authority on the continuing applicability of the doctrine of mutuality to clubs, the Court declined writ adjudication and directed that any grievance be pursued before the Appellate Tribunal, where errors in the impugned order could be corrected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>