<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 25 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32262</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the assessee-an NSE member engaged in share trading-sufficiently established the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of shareholders in respect of share application money. The court noted the investor company was widely held with paid-up capital of Rs 3.4 crores and found the assessee had discharged its onus on veracity of transactions, relying on existing Division Bench precedent, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 25 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32262</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that the assessee-an NSE member engaged in share trading-sufficiently established the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of shareholders in respect of share application money. The court noted the investor company was widely held with paid-up capital of Rs 3.4 crores and found the assessee had discharged its onus on veracity of transactions, relying on existing Division Bench precedent, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>