<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1516 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307230</link>
    <description>Provisional release of goods had to be decided by the respondent on its own merits and in accordance with law within a specified time. The petitioner was also allowed the presence of an advocate at visible but not audible distance during investigation, and videography of the statement recording was permitted at the petitioner&#039;s expense. The petition was disposed of with partial relief in these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 08:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1516 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307230</link>
      <description>Provisional release of goods had to be decided by the respondent on its own merits and in accordance with law within a specified time. The petitioner was also allowed the presence of an advocate at visible but not audible distance during investigation, and videography of the statement recording was permitted at the petitioner&#039;s expense. The petition was disposed of with partial relief in these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>