<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1946 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issues back to the AO for de novo adjudication, considering all incidental facts and material, including the orders of the Special Court, CBI, New Delhi. The AO was directed to afford a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee before deciding the issue. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 08:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1946 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issues back to the AO for de novo adjudication, considering all incidental facts and material, including the orders of the Special Court, CBI, New Delhi. The AO was directed to afford a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee before deciding the issue. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>