<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1224 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435838</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT KOLKATA set aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the rent paid by the developer to the assessee was a capital receipt and not taxable income. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1224 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435838</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT KOLKATA set aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the rent paid by the developer to the assessee was a capital receipt and not taxable income. Consequently, the penalty was deemed unjustified, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>