<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1219 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435833</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing allocation of market spread between an Indian marketing branch and trader-associated enterprises must reflect their respective functions, assets and risks. The marketer retains its local spread, but the residual market spread cannot be wholly attributed to the Indian branch merely because transactions were executed in India; the adjustment was deleted. Gains of a foreign institutional investor from the sale and purchase of debt securities were assessable as capital gains rather than business income under earlier binding decisions. The Indian banking branch did not, on the stated facts, make those gains taxable as business profits in India, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1219 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435833</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing allocation of market spread between an Indian marketing branch and trader-associated enterprises must reflect their respective functions, assets and risks. The marketer retains its local spread, but the residual market spread cannot be wholly attributed to the Indian branch merely because transactions were executed in India; the adjustment was deleted. Gains of a foreign institutional investor from the sale and purchase of debt securities were assessable as capital gains rather than business income under earlier binding decisions. The Indian banking branch did not, on the stated facts, make those gains taxable as business profits in India, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>