<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1207 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the appellant is eligible for CENVAT Credit on molasses used in the manufacture of dutiable products, based on the interpretation of CENVAT Rules and previous legal precedents. The Tribunal referred to relevant cases and held that the appellant&#039;s method of availing Credit was valid as they only availed Credit on the portion of molasses used for dutiable products, following established legal principles. The impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1207 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that the appellant is eligible for CENVAT Credit on molasses used in the manufacture of dutiable products, based on the interpretation of CENVAT Rules and previous legal precedents. The Tribunal referred to relevant cases and held that the appellant&#039;s method of availing Credit was valid as they only availed Credit on the portion of molasses used for dutiable products, following established legal principles. The impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>