<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1369 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307216</link>
    <description>Consideration received from Indian customers for sale of software was treated as not constituting royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12 of the India-US DTAA, following the Supreme Court ruling in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd.; accordingly, such software receipts were not taxable on that basis. Receipts from annual maintenance, implementation and consultancy services linked to the same software transactions were also held not taxable as fees for technical services, because the underlying software payments were not royalty and the Revenue could not establish a separate taxable character. The resulting additions on both counts were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1369 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307216</link>
      <description>Consideration received from Indian customers for sale of software was treated as not constituting royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act or Article 12 of the India-US DTAA, following the Supreme Court ruling in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd.; accordingly, such software receipts were not taxable on that basis. Receipts from annual maintenance, implementation and consultancy services linked to the same software transactions were also held not taxable as fees for technical services, because the underlying software payments were not royalty and the Revenue could not establish a separate taxable character. The resulting additions on both counts were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>