<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1194 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act was beyond the reasonable limitation period of four years and therefore invalid. The order was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1194 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act was beyond the reasonable limitation period of four years and therefore invalid. The order was quashed, and the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>