<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435802</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order, finding that the Assessing Officer had made a proper decision in line with the law and CBDT Circular regarding the Annual Letting Value of unsold flats held as stock-in-trade. The invocation of revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 by the PCIT was considered unjustified. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 03/02/2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435802</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order, finding that the Assessing Officer had made a proper decision in line with the law and CBDT Circular regarding the Annual Letting Value of unsold flats held as stock-in-trade. The invocation of revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 by the PCIT was considered unjustified. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 03/02/2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>