<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1183 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435797</link>
    <description>Non-consideration of additional documentary evidence relevant to the 90-day stay test, including passport material, vitiated the assessment and DRP directions because the assessee&#039;s objections were not examined on the full record. The endorsement of the adverse view without evaluating the fresh evidence amounted to a breach of natural justice. The matter was therefore restored to the DRP for fresh adjudication after considering the documentary evidence on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1183 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435797</link>
      <description>Non-consideration of additional documentary evidence relevant to the 90-day stay test, including passport material, vitiated the assessment and DRP directions because the assessee&#039;s objections were not examined on the full record. The endorsement of the adverse view without evaluating the fresh evidence amounted to a breach of natural justice. The matter was therefore restored to the DRP for fresh adjudication after considering the documentary evidence on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>