https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435791 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the appellant's 'customs broker' license under CHALR, 2004 regulations by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. It criticized the lack of justification for merging two distinct proceedings, emphasized procedural fairness, and highlighted the importance of treating each case independently. The Tribunal found the rejection of the cross-examination request as affecting credibility and stressed the need for adherence to procedural rights. The impugned order was remanded for fresh decisions, emphasizing the significance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in the matter. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:59:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435791 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the appellant's 'customs broker' license under CHALR, 2004 regulations by the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. It criticized the lack of justification for merging two distinct proceedings, emphasized procedural fairness, and highlighted the importance of treating each case independently. The Tribunal found the rejection of the cross-examination request as affecting credibility and stressed the need for adherence to procedural rights. The impugned order was remanded for fresh decisions, emphasizing the significance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles in the matter. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435791