<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1171 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435785</link>
    <description>The court set aside the orders rejecting refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and remanded the matter for reconsideration of rebate claims under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The court emphasized the distinction between substantive conditions and procedural requirements, directing the Appellate Authority to reassess the claims in light of this distinction and relevant material on record. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1171 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435785</link>
      <description>The court set aside the orders rejecting refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and remanded the matter for reconsideration of rebate claims under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The court emphasized the distinction between substantive conditions and procedural requirements, directing the Appellate Authority to reassess the claims in light of this distinction and relevant material on record. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>