https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32239 Remission of excise duty was treated as available where finished goods were destroyed in an unavoidable fire, because the destruction of the goods was not in dispute and the remission rule extends to loss by unavoidable accident or natural cause. The text also states that related relief could not be denied for inputs, semi-finished goods, packing material, consumables, and capital goods destroyed in the same fire, as the contrary view was rejected and the Larger Bench approach on input and intermediate-product consequences was applied. Consequential relief was therefore granted on all disputed items. en-us Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32239 Remission of excise duty was treated as available where finished goods were destroyed in an unavoidable fire, because the destruction of the goods was not in dispute and the remission rule extends to loss by unavoidable accident or natural cause. The text also states that related relief could not be denied for inputs, semi-finished goods, packing material, consumables, and capital goods destroyed in the same fire, as the contrary view was rejected and the Larger Bench approach on input and intermediate-product consequences was applied. Consequential relief was therefore granted on all disputed items. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32239