https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307206 The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the validity of the Deputy Custodian General's order canceling the appellants' allotment of land in village Ratauli. The court upheld the order based on the grounds that the appellants were not sitting allottees and the land was initially reserved for a Railway Workshop, emphasizing equitable distribution and proper rehabilitation of displaced persons. The Full Bench validated Rule 14(6) of the Administration of Evacuee Property Rules and found no manifest errors in the Deputy Custodian General's order, leading to the rejection of the appeal. en-us Fri, 24 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:49:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307206 The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the validity of the Deputy Custodian General's order canceling the appellants' allotment of land in village Ratauli. The court upheld the order based on the grounds that the appellants were not sitting allottees and the land was initially reserved for a Railway Workshop, emphasizing equitable distribution and proper rehabilitation of displaced persons. The Full Bench validated Rule 14(6) of the Administration of Evacuee Property Rules and found no manifest errors in the Deputy Custodian General's order, leading to the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307206