https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307205 Disciplinary findings were held unsustainable where the inquiry ignored material evidence favourable to the employee and relied on suspicion, unsupported inferences and inadmissible material. In certiorari under Article 226, interference was justified because the domestic conclusion was based on no proper evidence and caused manifest injustice. The alleged misconduct concerning property in the wife's name also failed: the Conduct Rules cover benami acquisition by the employee or property actually acquired by the employee, but do not treat an independent acquisition by the spouse as the employee's asset without a reasoned finding to that effect. The writ petition succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside for fresh disposal. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:13:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307205 Disciplinary findings were held unsustainable where the inquiry ignored material evidence favourable to the employee and relied on suspicion, unsupported inferences and inadmissible material. In certiorari under Article 226, interference was justified because the domestic conclusion was based on no proper evidence and caused manifest injustice. The alleged misconduct concerning property in the wife's name also failed: the Conduct Rules cover benami acquisition by the employee or property actually acquired by the employee, but do not treat an independent acquisition by the spouse as the employee's asset without a reasoned finding to that effect. The writ petition succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside for fresh disposal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307205