https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435773 The Court upheld the order under Section 148-A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the reasons provided by the first respondent to be justifiable. The petitioner's failure to explain the substantial deposits in the Axis Bank account and the absence of an income return led to the dismissal of the writ petition. The Court concluded that there was no merit in challenging the impugned order, resulting in the closure of the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition without costs. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:10:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435773 The Court upheld the order under Section 148-A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding the reasons provided by the first respondent to be justifiable. The petitioner's failure to explain the substantial deposits in the Axis Bank account and the absence of an income return led to the dismissal of the writ petition. The Court concluded that there was no merit in challenging the impugned order, resulting in the closure of the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435773