<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1150 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435764</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 instead of section 153C were invalid. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal found that when documents pertaining to a different entity are discovered during a search, section 153C should be invoked. The reassessment order was deemed null and void, leading to the quashing of the reassessment order. Other grounds raised by the assessee were not addressed as a result. The appeal was partly allowed, with the order pronounced on 23.03.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1150 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435764</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 instead of section 153C were invalid. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal found that when documents pertaining to a different entity are discovered during a search, section 153C should be invoked. The reassessment order was deemed null and void, leading to the quashing of the reassessment order. Other grounds raised by the assessee were not addressed as a result. The appeal was partly allowed, with the order pronounced on 23.03.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>