<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435746</link>
    <description>Claim for refund of excess additional customs duty was examined on limitation and unjust enrichment. The Delhi HC had remanded the matter and rejected the Revenue&#039;s limitation plea, obliging lower authorities to decide on merits; consequently the refund sanction was upheld. On unjust enrichment the tribunal held that absence of evidence showing duty was passed on to customers, and the consistency of a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate with the balance sheet and P&amp;L, sufficed to negate passing-on; the Revenue failed to rebut or produce contrary documentation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the refund sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435746</link>
      <description>Claim for refund of excess additional customs duty was examined on limitation and unjust enrichment. The Delhi HC had remanded the matter and rejected the Revenue&#039;s limitation plea, obliging lower authorities to decide on merits; consequently the refund sanction was upheld. On unjust enrichment the tribunal held that absence of evidence showing duty was passed on to customers, and the consistency of a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate with the balance sheet and P&amp;L, sufficed to negate passing-on; the Revenue failed to rebut or produce contrary documentation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and the refund sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>