<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules SEZ Refunds Must Be Granted Despite Procedural Errors; Exemption Intended to Be Absolute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68929</link>
    <description>Refund - Period of limitation - Considering the beneficial object of establishing the SEZ tax free, without any burden of duties, the procedural lapse, if any, cannot be the basis to deny the refund to the appellant. The exemption is intended to be absolute is further evident from para 3 (II) of the Notification which provides for ab-initio exemption. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:08:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules SEZ Refunds Must Be Granted Despite Procedural Errors; Exemption Intended to Be Absolute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68929</link>
      <description>Refund - Period of limitation - Considering the beneficial object of establishing the SEZ tax free, without any burden of duties, the procedural lapse, if any, cannot be the basis to deny the refund to the appellant. The exemption is intended to be absolute is further evident from para 3 (II) of the Notification which provides for ab-initio exemption. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:08:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>