<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1972 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307200</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, dismissing the disallowance of premium for leasehold rights based on precedent, setting aside ad-hoc expense disallowance for further examination, deleting disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for TDS, allowing appeal against addition under section 41(1) due to lack of evidence, and directing reconsideration of depreciation disallowance with submission of additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:07:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1972 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307200</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, dismissing the disallowance of premium for leasehold rights based on precedent, setting aside ad-hoc expense disallowance for further examination, deleting disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for TDS, allowing appeal against addition under section 41(1) due to lack of evidence, and directing reconsideration of depreciation disallowance with submission of additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>