<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Reviews Denial of Input Tax Credit Refund for Export of Services u/s 2(6) of IGST Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68926</link>
    <description>Rejection of refund for input tax credit (ITC) - export of services - There is no dispute that the recipient of Services – that is EY Entities – are located outside India. Thus, indisputably, the Services provided by the petitioner would fall within the scope of the definition of the term ‘export of service’ under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 19:19:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 19:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Reviews Denial of Input Tax Credit Refund for Export of Services u/s 2(6) of IGST Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68926</link>
      <description>Rejection of refund for input tax credit (ITC) - export of services - There is no dispute that the recipient of Services – that is EY Entities – are located outside India. Thus, indisputably, the Services provided by the petitioner would fall within the scope of the definition of the term ‘export of service’ under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 19:19:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>