<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32228</link>
    <description>The Court found no statutory obligation on the employer to collect evidence regarding the utilization of Leave Travel Concession (LTC) or Conveyance Allowance by employees, emphasizing the individual nature of the exemption under Section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court dismissed the Civil Appeals without any order regarding costs, clarifying the absence of specific directives from the Central Board of Direct Taxes mandating employers to collect and scrutinize supporting evidence for the Declaration submitted by employees under Section 192.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32228</link>
      <description>The Court found no statutory obligation on the employer to collect evidence regarding the utilization of Leave Travel Concession (LTC) or Conveyance Allowance by employees, emphasizing the individual nature of the exemption under Section 10(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court dismissed the Civil Appeals without any order regarding costs, clarifying the absence of specific directives from the Central Board of Direct Taxes mandating employers to collect and scrutinize supporting evidence for the Declaration submitted by employees under Section 192.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>