<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioners&#039; Committee Claims Commissioner (Appeals) Not Bound by Judicial Discipline, Criticizes Adherence to High Court Precedent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68914</link>
    <description>Judicial discipline - We are surprised as to how the Committee of two Commissioners has not only concluded that the Commissioner (Appeals) does not have to follow judicial discipline but have gone further to say that the Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in following the binding precedent of the jurisdictional High Court. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 13:45:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 13:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioners&#039; Committee Claims Commissioner (Appeals) Not Bound by Judicial Discipline, Criticizes Adherence to High Court Precedent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68914</link>
      <description>Judicial discipline - We are surprised as to how the Committee of two Commissioners has not only concluded that the Commissioner (Appeals) does not have to follow judicial discipline but have gone further to say that the Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in following the binding precedent of the jurisdictional High Court. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 13:45:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>