<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1114 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435728</link>
    <description>The AAR Karnataka held that transfer of an independent business division as a going concern constitutes supply of services under Section 7 of CGST Act 2017, not goods. The transaction qualified as supply being made for consideration in course of business. The ruling classified it under SAC 997119 (financial services) attracting 18% GST rate. However, the authority determined that notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) entry 2 applies, providing NIL GST rate for transfer of going concern or independent part thereof. The AAR declined ruling on recipient&#039;s input tax credit entitlement, citing jurisdictional limitations under Section 95(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1114 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435728</link>
      <description>The AAR Karnataka held that transfer of an independent business division as a going concern constitutes supply of services under Section 7 of CGST Act 2017, not goods. The transaction qualified as supply being made for consideration in course of business. The ruling classified it under SAC 997119 (financial services) attracting 18% GST rate. However, the authority determined that notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) entry 2 applies, providing NIL GST rate for transfer of going concern or independent part thereof. The AAR declined ruling on recipient&#039;s input tax credit entitlement, citing jurisdictional limitations under Section 95(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>