<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1109 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that accumulated profits for the purpose of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act should be determined after accounting for depreciation as per the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the disallowance addition of Rs. 4,55,83,131/-.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1109 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that accumulated profits for the purpose of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act should be determined after accounting for depreciation as per the Act. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to delete the disallowance addition of Rs. 4,55,83,131/-.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>