<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1102 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the fund transfers between the related companies were for business exigencies and did not constitute deemed dividend income under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 16,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1102 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the fund transfers between the related companies were for business exigencies and did not constitute deemed dividend income under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 16,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>