<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1081 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435695</link>
    <description>The case involved the confirmation of customs duty on a &#039;work accommodation barge&#039; imported by M/s Jayesh Shipping Pvt Ltd. The appellant contested the duty based on discrepancies in valuation estimates and challenged the penalty imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The barge was initially imported for temporary deployment, underwent a transfer of registry, and was later offered for sale. The appellant argued that the re-assessment process did not adhere to valuation provisions and that penalties were unjustified. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh determination of all issues raised by the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1081 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435695</link>
      <description>The case involved the confirmation of customs duty on a &#039;work accommodation barge&#039; imported by M/s Jayesh Shipping Pvt Ltd. The appellant contested the duty based on discrepancies in valuation estimates and challenged the penalty imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The barge was initially imported for temporary deployment, underwent a transfer of registry, and was later offered for sale. The appellant argued that the re-assessment process did not adhere to valuation provisions and that penalties were unjustified. The case was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh determination of all issues raised by the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>