https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435691 Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as a substitute for rehearing or appeal. Where a judgment-debtor had repeatedly been directed to file an affidavit of assets, did not challenge those directions, and still failed to comply after further opportunity, the objection that no such affidavit was required did not disclose any self-evident error in the warrant order. The review request was therefore not maintainable, and the warrant of arrest order remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:46:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435691 Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC is confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used as a substitute for rehearing or appeal. Where a judgment-debtor had repeatedly been directed to file an affidavit of assets, did not challenge those directions, and still failed to comply after further opportunity, the objection that no such affidavit was required did not disclose any self-evident error in the warrant order. The review request was therefore not maintainable, and the warrant of arrest order remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435691