https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435678 A conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained where the evidence showed that money had been advanced, a promissory note had been executed, and the cheque with the accused's signature and account details was issued towards part discharge of that debt. The accused's claim that the cheque was stolen, or that the account had been closed earlier, was rejected because no loss of cheque was reported to the bank or police and the bank evidence did not support that defence. Dishonour for "account closed" and postal records showing repeated delivery attempts supported compliance with statutory notice requirements, including service to the correct address. No ground for revisional interference was made out. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Mar 2023 08:45:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435678 A conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained where the evidence showed that money had been advanced, a promissory note had been executed, and the cheque with the accused's signature and account details was issued towards part discharge of that debt. The accused's claim that the cheque was stolen, or that the account had been closed earlier, was rejected because no loss of cheque was reported to the bank or police and the bank evidence did not support that defence. Dishonour for "account closed" and postal records showing repeated delivery attempts supported compliance with statutory notice requirements, including service to the correct address. No ground for revisional interference was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435678