<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1359 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in assuming jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate enquiries. The Tribunal held that the order passed under Section 263 was not justified, quashed it, and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the genuine reasons presented by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1359 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in assuming jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate enquiries. The Tribunal held that the order passed under Section 263 was not justified, quashed it, and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to the genuine reasons presented by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>