<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32219</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the enhancement of value for imported photocopier machines and components, as the Revenue failed to prove the fair value of the goods. The confiscation of goods was upheld due to them being restricted items. The appellants&#039; acceptance of the enhanced value during import was deemed involuntary, leading to a reduction in redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 164 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32219</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the enhancement of value for imported photocopier machines and components, as the Revenue failed to prove the fair value of the goods. The confiscation of goods was upheld due to them being restricted items. The appellants&#039; acceptance of the enhanced value during import was deemed involuntary, leading to a reduction in redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>