<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1298 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307187</link>
    <description>For divorce on the ground of mental disorder under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the alleging spouse must prove a severe and enduring condition of such nature that normal marital life cannot reasonably be expected to continue; a mere diagnosis or manageable illness is insufficient. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s assessment that the evidence did not establish serious schizophrenia or incurable unsoundness of mind in the wife, and found the medical material showed at most a treatable and manageable condition. On that basis, the statutory ground for divorce was not made out, and the decree for restitution of conjugal rights was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1298 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307187</link>
      <description>For divorce on the ground of mental disorder under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, the alleging spouse must prove a severe and enduring condition of such nature that normal marital life cannot reasonably be expected to continue; a mere diagnosis or manageable illness is insufficient. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s assessment that the evidence did not establish serious schizophrenia or incurable unsoundness of mind in the wife, and found the medical material showed at most a treatable and manageable condition. On that basis, the statutory ground for divorce was not made out, and the decree for restitution of conjugal rights was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>